Packaging EPR fees

Understand what drives packaging EPR fees and prepare for 2027.

How producer fees are generally calculated, why they vary by state, and a practical plan for budgeting 2027 fees.

Author: CertaRelayRequirements may change. Verify current obligations with the applicable agency, PRO or qualified counsel.

Short answer: Packaging EPR fees are generally calculated by multiplying the quantity of each packaging material you supply into a state by that program's rate for the material category, then applying state-specific adjustments such as eco-modulation. Rates are set by each program and can change annually, so any forecast is an estimate until the program invoices you.

The general model

Most programs follow the same basic logic, even though the details differ:

Illustrative formula, not an official calculation Fee (state, year) = Σ over material categories [ reported quantity of material × program rate for that category ] ± eco-modulation adjustments ± other program-specific adjustments

Reported quantity usually starts from your packaging data: component weight × components per unit × units supplied into the state during the data year. That is why packaging data quality drives fee accuracy.

Illustrative example

The example below uses invented rates and quantities purely to show the mechanics. It does not reflect any program's actual rates.

Illustrative only. Rates, categories and quantities are invented and do not represent any state program.
Material category (illustrative)Quantity suppliedIllustrative rateIllustrative fee
Paperboard40,000 lb$0.10 / lb$4,000
PET bottles15,000 lb$0.30 / lb$4,500
Flexible plastic film3,000 lb$0.80 / lb$2,400
Subtotal before adjustments$10,900

In a real program, the categories would be the program's own list, and eco-modulation might raise or lower the charge for specific components.

Why rates and classifications vary

  • Each program sets its own rates. Rates reflect the costs a program must fund in that state, which depend on its needs assessment, infrastructure and plan. In Oregon, for example, DEQ explains that fee rates are allocated based on producer supply and change annually.
  • Material categories differ. Programs group materials differently, so the same component can land in different categories with different rates.
  • Eco-modulation. Several programs adjust fees for attributes such as recyclability, recycled content or reuse. Colorado's regulations include eco-modulation, and Minnesota's law requires fees to vary based on factors including recyclability and postconsumer content.
  • Program maturity. Early-stage programs may change methodology as they gather data, so year-over-year comparisons need care.

Scenario modeling

A forecast becomes useful for decisions when you can change the inputs. CertaRelay models scenarios such as:

  • Switching a component material, for example a plastic tray to molded fiber.
  • Lightweighting a bottle or carton.
  • Adding recycled content where programs reward it.
  • Entering a new state or channel.
  • Rate changes in published program schedules.

Each scenario is labeled with its assumptions and the source of any rates used. When official rates are not yet published, the forecast says so and uses clearly marked placeholder assumptions.

How to prepare for 2027 fees

2027 is the year many brands will feel EPR fees across more than one program at once. Oregon and Colorado are already charging producers. In California, CalRecycle received Circular Action Alliance's producer responsibility plan on October 13, 2026 and has 75 days to review it, so California fee details depend on that plan. A practical preparation sequence:

  1. Lock your data year. Confirm which period each program's 2027 invoices will be based on, and make sure sales by state for that period are exportable.
  2. Close the biggest weight gaps first. Fees scale with weight, so prioritize your highest-volume SKUs and heaviest components.
  3. Get materials right. Misclassifying a component into a higher-cost category overstates fees; unsupported favorable classifications create risk.
  4. Build a range, not a point. Where official rates are final, use them. Where they are not, model low and high scenarios and label the assumptions.
  5. Put it in the budget. Give finance a documented estimate now and refresh it as programs publish final schedules.
  6. Look for redesign wins. Eco-modulation means packaging changes can move fees. Identify the few components that drive most of the cost.

Compliance-service fees versus producer fees

These are different things, and it is worth being explicit:

Producer fees or duesCompliance-service fees
Who sets themThe state program or PROYour service provider
Who you payThe PRO or programThe service provider
What they fundCollection, recycling infrastructure, municipal reimbursement and program administrationThe work of preparing your data and reports
How calculatedReported quantities × program rates, with adjustmentsAgreed scope

CertaRelay's fees are compliance-service fees. CertaRelay does not set, collect or guarantee producer fees. See CertaRelay pricing.

CertaRelay recommendation

Forecast early, even with rough data. Finance teams need to budget for producer fees before programs invoice, and a forecast built on documented assumptions is far more useful than no number at all.

Next step

Find out what your packaging data is missing.

The EPR Readiness & Data Assessment, from $1,000, reviews your states, reporting status and data gaps, and ends with a fixed proposal. The full fee is credited if you proceed within 60 days.